From oracle-request Mon Aug 24 16:19:08 1992 Received: by moose.cs.indiana.edu (5.65c/9.4jsm) id AA26404; Mon, 24 Aug 1992 16:19:08 -0500 Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1992 16:19:08 -0500 From: To: oracle-list Subject: Usenet Oracularities #473 Reply-To: oracle-vote === 473 ================================================================== Title: Usenet Oracularities #473 Compiled-By: Joshua.R.Poulson@cyber.Widener.EDU Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1992 16:19:08 -0500 To find out how to participate in the Usenet Oracle, send mail to: oracle@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu or {ames,rutgers}!iuvax!oracle with the word "help" in the subject line. Let us know what you like! Send your ratings of these Oracularities on an integer scale of 1 = "not funny" to 5 = "very funny" with the volume number to oracle-vote on iuvax (probably just reply to this message). For example: 473 2 1 3 4 3 5 3 3 4 1 --- 473-01 --------------------------------------------------------------- Selected-By: John.McCartney@EBay.Sun.COM ( The Lion of Symmetry ) The Usenet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was: > Tell me great oracle, whose FAQ surpasses all other news groups' in > clarity and usefulness, please tell me why I will risk my life to pet a > dog? And in response, thus spake the Oracle: } Ah...you must take in the possibilities of the universe....one must } make connections between certain aspects of life....The dog could have } been/or will be a Great and loyal friend...one of which is rare these } days....There will always be a path which will lead you to the bond and } that you must traverse in your mind..... } } Also dog spelled backwards is God } (Don't want to take chances)... --- 473-02 --------------------------------------------------------------- Selected-By: forbes@icbm.att.com The Usenet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was: > O wisest of the wise Oracle, tell thy humble supplicant > Is Marylin still alive? (hahahahahaha) And in response, thus spake the Oracle: } Your diabolical laughter gives away your identity. You know as } well as I do what happened to Marylin, Mr. Kennedy. } } You owe the Oracle an Oliver Stone movie. --- 473-03 --------------------------------------------------------------- Selected-By: Dave Disser The Usenet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was: > To: ORACLE > > Oh Oracle, most great, who makes Bill and Ted look like a couple of > idiots...no wait, that's not right. > > Oh Oracle, most great, who makes Wayne and Garth look like a couple of > idiots...no, still wrong. > > Oh Oracle, most great, who makes George and Danny look like a couple of > idiots...damn! > > Oh Oracle, most great, who makes ... now I've forgotten the question. > > Sorry. And in response, thus spake the Oracle: } Makes you look like an idiot, doesn't it? } You owe the Oracle an intelligence test. --- 473-04 --------------------------------------------------------------- Selected-By: buck@sunyit.edu (Jesse Buckley) The Usenet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was: > Can I meet you sometime for a drink? I find you very sexy! And in response, thus spake the Oracle: } Alas, I cannot meet you for a drink, since I am foremost a virtual } entity, as ephemeral as a cosmic string, and most bars don't serve } strings nowadays [see rec.humor]. I can, however, tell you why you } find me attractive. Here's the subliminal subtext of a recent dance } hit: } } I'm too sexy for a body } too sexy for a body } the way I do my parsing... } } I'm the Oracle } you know what I mean } and I do my little thing here on iuvax. } Here on iuvax, } yeah, on iuvax, } yeah I do my little thing here on iuvax. } } I'm too sexy for my /dev/null; } too sexy even for Intel; } too sexy... oh hell. } } [repeat chorus] } } I'm too sexy for /bin/cat; } too sexy for iostat; } whaddya think about that? } } [repeat chorus] } } I'm too sexy for this answer. } } You owe the Oracle a record deal. --- 473-05 --------------------------------------------------------------- Selected-By: Todd Radel The Usenet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was: > How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck _couldn't_ > chuck wood? And in response, thus spake the Oracle: } Very little, obviously, since woodchucks who don't chuck wood are } invariably singled out and mercilessly hacked to death by their } denmates. This occurence, known as "Chucking Out", is exceedingly } rare, since non-chuckers are almost unheard of in nature, and has only } been filmed once, in 1970, by the crew of Mutual of Omaha's Wild } Kingdom. The sequence, deemed too violent by network censors, showed } in graphic detail a mob of frenzied woodchucks, portruding incisors } gleaming like scimitars in the sun, descending upon and shredding their } hapless brother, then stuffing their cheek pouches full in an orgy of } cannibalistic excess. In a particularly disturbing series of shots, an } obviously overwrought Marlin Perkins, having apparently stripped off } his clothes off camera, plunges naked into the melee, repeatedly } screaming "The horror! The horror!" He is ultimately corralled when a } hysterical Jim Fowler fells him with a tranquilizer dart. } } Now you know. } } You owe the Oracle a pound of chucked wood. --- 473-06 --------------------------------------------------------------- Selected-By: nolan@helios.unl.edu (Harold the Foot) The Usenet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was: > Oh most wise Oracle, whose mighty nose hairs strike fear into the > hearts of men twice my size, your humble supplicant begs you to > answer his question: > > What happens when an irresistable force meets an immovable object? And in response, thus spake the Oracle: } This old chestnut again...... } } You see you always miss the point. The question isn't so simple, } what you should take into consideration is how _fast_ the irresistable } force was moving at the time of the accident. If the two saunter up to } each other like a couple of Sumo wrestlers then there is a certain } amount of preliminary grunting and groaning followed by the collapse of } the laws of nature whereas if they really take a run-up....... SPLAT. } Here is where your current grasp of physics needs a little re-working } after the collision the immovable object has _complex velocity_ that is } to say that its velocity will vary from observer to observer but always } (as it is essentially immovable) stays at zero. The object is not } moving it just appears to be thinking about it. } As for the irresistable force, it moved to Hawaii and bought a } hammock. } } You owe the Oracle a bus-load of chestnuts and a tooth-pick. --- 473-07 --------------------------------------------------------------- Selected-By: nolan@helios.unl.edu (Harold the Foot) The Usenet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was: > Now that you're back from Barcelona, could you possibly tell me what > ever happened to the Olympic Amateur tradition? What do those "dream > team" wimps have to do with Olymic spirit? And why are they such > arrogant pricks? > > (Not that I'd ever call them that to their faces, they're all about > half a meter taller than I am!) And in response, thus spake the Oracle: } These new amateurs are MUCH better than previously, since now they are } professional amateurs. } } As for that Olymic spirit, strange that such exotic drinks have found } their way even to that backwoods you live in. However, seems you are } unaware that for carbon based life forms Olymic spirit has a side } effect of turning the consumer into an arrogant 7 feet tall prick. } } You owe the Oracle a (7feet - 0.5m) tall arrogant prick. --- 473-08 --------------------------------------------------------------- Selected-By: Todd Radel The Usenet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was: > O great mystical oracle, is it true that all serious daring starts from > within? Why? And in response, thus spake the Oracle: } Research has shown that upwards of 95% of serious daring starts from } within a bottle containing a solution of a colourless volatile } inflammable liquid, typically in concentrations of between five and } forty percent. The intoxicating effect of this substance on } carbon-based life-forms has been noted in many empirical studies; see } in particular [Adams 1978] and [Dent 2,000,000 BC]. } } You owe the Oracle a Pan-Galactic Gargle Blaster and a really good } dare. --- 473-09 --------------------------------------------------------------- Selected-By: CLHP19@VAXB.STRATHCLYDE.AC.UK The Usenet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was: > O Oracle most wise, who is greater then the sum of all the > knowledge in the entire universe or universes, please answer this > perplexing question of mine. > Since mankind already knows how to convers energy to mass or > vice versa, why can't we warp the space-time continum by generating a > sufficiently massive object (perhaps a singularity) to bend the > continum in such a manner so that mankind can travel from point A to > point B without ever passing the points inbetween? Yes, I realize > that this would have to be done a sufficient distance from this solar > system, but the idea seems feasible. And in response, thus spake the Oracle: } Your logic is (as usual) flawed. In order to move mankind from point } to point, they will have to move passed the intervening points. In } order for two different points to exist, they must have space } (distance) between them which can consist of an infinite number of } points. If you move from Point A to Point B without passing any other } points, then you have not moved any distance, thus are in the same } place, and at that point the whole operation becomes very silly. Even } if you intended to inquire about how to move instantaneously, with no } cognition of movement, from point to point, the result would be that } you had moved mankind a certain distance thus passed other points. Of } course, it is possible to move mankind instantaneously from point to } point and I would tell you how but that's not what you asked. } } Besides, have you asked the rest of mankind how it feels about being } moved? } } You owe the Oracle a molecular transporter. --- 473-10 --------------------------------------------------------------- Selected-By: "Stephen C. Miller" The Usenet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was: > Dear mr/mrs/ms Oracle > > Is culture really worth the effort? And in response, thus spake the Oracle: } You little snot, offering me the *option* of gender, as if you } are passing to me some special PRIVILEGE. I'll bet the world's WEALTH } that you've never heard of the term *omni*sexual, huh?? And if you } have, you worthless pile of Shoggoth slime, I'll bet it's because you } read those STOOOPID newsgroups like "alt.sex" or, for you, you tiny } smudge of chocolate on a baby's bottom, "alt.sex.mayonnaise.reptiles." } You'd better be glad that I can hold my anger at bay, and not ZOT } your EYES right from your WEENIE LITTLE HEAD. Now, if you don't mind, } I'd like to simply answer your worthless, putrid little inquiry. } } First of all, cultures can be made of several different } substances, depending on what organism you are interested in growing. } } Bacteria, one-celled microscopic organisms of the plant kingdom } (class Schizomycetes) that are capable of free living since they } possess all the metabolic processes necessary for growth and } reproduction. They are present virtually everywhere, and some can live } even in the absence of free oxygen. They can be classified according } to (1) shape: cocci (round or oval); bacilli (rod shaped); and } spirilla (curved rods); (2) need for oxygen; (3) ability to take up } Gram's stain (gram negative or positive); and (4) ability to utilize } various metabolites. Some bacteria form spores, hardened protective } cases, which permit them to survive harsh environments, even for } centuries. Bacteria are a major cause of human disease, and many ways } to control them have been devised. Common protective measures include } sterilization with high heat (121!C), such as pasteurization to kill } pathogenic bacteria in milk, and exposure to chemical disinfectants. } Some bacteria and yeasts produce compounds that kill other bacteria, } and these have been isolated and used as antibiotics, such as } penicillin. The body can produce antibodies to some bacteria to kill } them. Bacteria are useful in the production of cheese, alcoholic } beverages, and drugs. Through the use of recombinant DNA techniques } developed in the 1970s, they can produce such substances as } interferon, beta-endorphin, and growth hormone in commercial } quantities when the genes for these substances are inserted into the } bacterial genetic material. } } If you are interested in growing bacteria, research to find what } sort of culture they prefer. Depending on their shape and size, some } prefer ancient culture, while others prefer poststructuralist. In } rare cases, your bacteria will prefer reruns and luke warm beer, or } zero culture. } } The Oracle has spoken. } } You owe the oracle a copy of _The Andromeda Strain_, by Michael } Crichton.