From oracle-request Sun Mar 15 12:45:50 1992 Received: by iuvax.cs.indiana.edu Date: Sun, 15 Mar 92 12:45:50 -0500 From: To: oracle-list Subject: Usenet Oracularities #422 Reply-To: oracle-vote X-Face: "9e\S&XFxP?L)~?^jbHC!$jk5#O}v\n#nwz8'd$#(H,+B4n<^{GSCr,![PCrQOV1 nW{vh|Ev<)b!y?'?aysJ)3YJ_/sOl@a'lKaG,uk|Xh3mR+xa]XJ!$vqAjQe?.nst;0/"u?M2K~rC6k~ |)'uWrn%alJW'QwwJJ441kc,m.C!?:EP49(+ X-Planation: X-Face can be viewed with "faces". From the iuvax archive today. === 422 ================================================================== Title: Usenet Oracularities #422 Compiled-By: Joshua.R.Poulson@cyber.Widener.EDU Date: Sun, 15 Mar 92 12:45:50 -0500 To find out how to participate in the Usenet Oracle, send mail to: oracle@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu or {ames,rutgers}!iuvax!oracle with the word "help" in the subject line. Let us know what you like! Send your ratings of these Oracularities on an integer scale of 1 = "not funny" to 5 = "very funny" with the volume number to oracle-vote on iuvax (probably just reply to this message). For example: 422 2 1 3 4 3 5 3 3 4 1 --- 422-01 --------------------------------------------------------------- Selected-By: Karyanta The Usenet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was: > Hi ho Oracle-o! > > Someone just hired the Mafia to kill me undetectably by altering > Planck's constant in my general vicinity. How can I fight back > against this fiendish plan? And in response, thus spake the Oracle: } That's ridiculous. You can't modify a constant. If the Mafia found } a way to modify a constant of Nature, than anyone would be susceptible } to ``bump offs'' by the Maf --- 422-02 --------------------------------------------------------------- Selected-By: dcharlet@rpslmc.edu (dale charletta) The Usenet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was: > Dear Oracle, > > What's that bug doing in your salad? And in response, thus spake the Oracle: } Crunch, crunch - which bug? That was salad a la feature! --- 422-03 --------------------------------------------------------------- Selected-By: Todd Radel The Usenet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was: > I've been following Richard Nixon's recent speeches, mostly critical > of Bush's approach to the (former) Soviet Union. I'm really impressed > by his intuition into foreign policy, and I'd like to ask you this: > Can we get this man to run for President? And in response, thus spake the Oracle: } Throughout each generation of man's existence, there has always } been an older sect that cries, "Back in my day, things were } better!" As you are a young whippersnapper, as these elderly } folk would put it, you seem to think that Nixon is a viable } choice for the Presidency. However, let me clue you in on } what the your elders think of this man. } } I don't know if you knew this or not, but Nixon actually used } to be the one and only President of the United States. That's } right, he was! Unfortunately for him, he was involved in a } highly-publicized scandal, which basically tried to give the } executive branch of our government more power than it should } over Congress. Now while the Oracle thinks this is a good thing, } the press at the time didn't agree. (Of course, many of those } reporters are..um...not longer with us, but I digress...) } } What most people don't know is that Nixon - in fact, the } whole Republican party - is innocent of the charges. } } The secruity system at the Democratic headquarters was, at } the time, a sliver of chewing gum wrapper put between the } front door and its frame. The Dems knew that if the wrapper } was found missing at any given time, then obviously someone } has broken in. Howeverm, it seems that an episode of the } Disco Kid (the early-70s version of MacGyver) was shot in } that very building. Disco grabbed the gum wrapper in order } to stop the countdown of a Communist mail bomb intended } for Gerald Ford, the Vice President at that time. Now, when } the Democrats saw that their safeguard had been triggered, } who better to blame than the Republicans? } } The media, finally sensing the lack in newsworthiness } of the the Beatles' break-up of three years before, needed } a boost in activity. So, they took the trumpeted the } accusations for all they were worth. The next thing you } knew, it was McCarthyism all over again, ending with Nixon's } unjust resignation, and a general decrease of sexual activity } within the Republican party for years to come. } } What does all have to do with the election of 1992? Well, } while Nixon may be an intelligent man, and probably a much } better choice than Bush (or Buchanan, or Tsongas, or Clinton), } he simply can't win without the male Republican vote. Even } today, they remember the days in the mid-70s when they weren't } getting as much sex as they would have liked. Lack of sex is } political homocide for *any* candidate. } } You owe the Oracle a study on how Clinton will } win this year's election by phallicy. --- 422-04 --------------------------------------------------------------- Selected-By: gt2126b@prism.gatech.edu (PETROSKY,WILLIAM T) The Usenet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was: > Ho! And in response, thus spake the Oracle: } Ha! Trying to impress The Oracle with obscure references, are we? } Will you mortals never learn. } } Naturally, I know quit a bit on the topic. To wit: } } Holmium, from Holmia, the latinized form of Stockholm, Sweden, meaning } the locality near which minerals rich in yttrium are found. A } trivalent metallic element of the rare-earth group that forms } cream-colored or yellow compounds which are among the most highly } magnetic known. } } You owe the Oracle a new CRC manual, as his old one is getting very } tired of this kind of question. Alternatively, since you brought the } subject up, one of those Swedish movies might be nice. --- 422-05 --------------------------------------------------------------- Selected-By: Russell S Porter The Usenet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was: > Oracle most wise and knowing, > > Why is it that fraternity members insist on wearing silly looking > letters, throwing parties where everyone acts like a total moron, and > generally act completely opposite from the leaders of the future they > claim to be? And in response, thus spake the Oracle: } But they are behaving as the future leaders of the world. Do you } really think they're in the congressional chambers giving/listening to } speeches? Do you really think they actually spend their time writing } legislation they can barely read? Don't be a cretin. } } No. They're in there partying their faces off. If you thought a } frat party was decadent, you should see what they're like when they're } funded by your tax dollars. Peace Dividend? You bet! They buy bigger } kegs and you pay higher taxes. } } "What about what I've seen on C-SPAN?" I hear you ask. "They're } all speechmaking and policywriting on TV." Well, where do you think } the special effects in Terminator-2 came from? Pixar? HAHAHAHA!! } Their stuff can be duplicated on a home computer in three days. } } No. The T-2 effects are the unclassified remnants of a } government project to create a computer simulation of congressmen at } work suitable for national broadcast. Why do you think everyone's so } hot about Virtual Reality? It's so that real people can tour the } nation's Capitol and *think* they're seeing they're elected } representatives hard at work. } } In fact, what they've been seeing for the past few years is the } most successful implementation of a VR system ever built. Their } representatives have in fact been partying in the next room for } decades. That's why they all get fat and sloppy; all that beer and } pretzels. } } This simulation project started in the early sixties to make } America believe that astronauts actually landed on the moon. Kennedy } knew about it, and was going to spill. Couldn't let that happen... } } You owe The Oracle a hideout. --- 422-06 --------------------------------------------------------------- Selected-By: Todd Radel The Usenet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was: > Hi Oracle! i'd like to thank you for your offer of employment. but > could you please give me more information, e.g. what you're willing to > pay? (it's very important to me, because i'm planning on going to grad > school this fall...) And in response, thus spake the Oracle: } Aside from the fact that you should accept whatever wages the Oracle } deems proper for your worthless labors, lets see if I've got this } straight: } } You're planning on going to grad school and are worried about what } something will pay? Don't you know there is a tradition which requires } that grad studentsbe poor and starving? } } This is necessary, because if you are going into a professional } discipline (law, medicine, etc.) you'll need the humility. If you are } going into a technical program (engineering, chemistry, etc.), you'll } need the experience so you can relate to your lab assistants. If you } are going into a humanities program (english, history, etc.), you'll } need the practice. } } You owe the Oracle a copy of the unexpurgated Dissertation Abstracts, } on CD-ROM. --- 422-07 --------------------------------------------------------------- Selected-By: Otis Viles <4164@alma.edu> The Usenet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was: > What's the meaning of life ? And in response, thus spake the Oracle: } Have you ever noticed that the amount of grovelling is inversely } proportional to the relative importance of the question? Find the } reason for this, and in the answer to that, you shall find the meaning } of life. } } Hint: It has nothing to do with Monty Python, and it is NOT 42, } DAMMIT!! } } Question Importance: 10 } Grovelling: 0 } } Supplicant Survival Index (SSI = Qi / G): Not A Number. } } Oracular AutoZOT feature: Activated. } } Oracular AutoDisclaimer feature: Activated. } } Oracular Coffee pot: Activated. } } Blood caffene level: 2% Diagnosis: Oracle is wired. } } Msg from kinzler@ovillage.barcelona.sp } I can't shut him down! Run, you fool, run! } } <<< ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ OOOOOO TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT >>> } <<< ZZZ OOO OOO TTT >>> } <<< ZZZ OOO OOO TTT >>> } <<< ZZZ OOO OOO TTT >>> } <<< ZZZ OOO OOO TTT >>> } <<< ZZZ OOO OOO TTT >>> } <<< ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ OOOOOO TTT >>> } } Msg from root@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu } What the f*ck was that! } } [For those without multimedia terminals with full motion video, the } largest recorded Oracular ZOT has just been released from iuvax. } Sporadic reports are coming in that the substation at IU suddenly } vaporized, along with much of the electrical distribution system as } the Oracular load crisped transmission lines. The building which } houses iuvax is glowing, with some eyewitness accounts stating that } several undergrad CS majors were vaporized instantly, leaving their } shadows on nearby walls. Reports are also coming in from Washington, } DC. It appears that the Vice-President's home is now a smouldering } crater. Catch the full report on ONN (the Oracular News Network), } which will have complete details as the come in.] } } Connection closed. } } ------------------------------------------------------------------------ } No, this couldn't possibly make the Oracularities. Naahhhh! They } wouldn't do that, not in a million years. --- 422-08 --------------------------------------------------------------- Selected-By: Karyanta The Usenet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was: > oracle o mighty, o greatest, o most phantasmagoric > > What is the answer to the question of life, the universe, and > everything? And in response, thus spake the Oracle: } Supplicant O puny, O leastest, O most reality-stricken: } } Everyone always assumes this is just one question which by suitable } twiddling and piecewise Riemann integration can yield the answer 42. } In fact, this is not the case; the three questions must be treated } separately for true knowledge to occur. Hence: } } --The answer to the question of life-- } Supplicant, all things fall into one of four categories: the living, } the dead, the non-living but non-dead, and the too small to worry } about. We shall look at the latter three first, in the hope that this } shall enlighten us. } } ==The dead== } These do not concern us; the set is growing ever-larger but, at least } at present, has no plans to enforce its majority rule. The dead no } longer have any influence on the living. } } ==The non-living but non-dead== } These are such things as rocks. Their sole function in relation to } life is to enable the transition from the living state to the dead } state, and that is really their only reason for being here. } } ==The too small to worry about== } Bacteria and the like. We won't. } } So, as you can see, the only things that influence the living are } rocks. Therefore, the answer to the question of life is: "Watch for } falling rocks." } } --The answer to the question of the universe-- } This question really asks, "What else is there for me?" Luckily, we } have the daytime soaps to answer that question, as the rich and famous } go jetting about the world and back in time for Timmy's school play } later that night (but, for some reason, also three days later that } week). Unless someone happens to get conked by a rock, soap stars live } forever, though sometimes requiring extensive plastic surgery and/or a } voiceover to explain their new appearances. } } Therefore, the answer to the question of the universe is: "Like sand } through an hourglass, these are the Days of Our Lives." } } --The answer to the question of everything-- } Supplicant, it is a well-known fact that when you dispose of } everything, nothing remains. As a result, to answer this question } would result in the revocation of my Oracular License and my enforced } retirement in the Neutral Zone. Therefore, the answer to the question } of everything is censored. } ===== } } Well, there you have it. The answer to life, the universe, and } everything is "Watch for falling rocks, which like sands through an } hourglass are censored by the Days of Our Lives." Happy to oblige. } } You owe the Oracle a rockslide shield, cable TV, a portrait of the CNN } dot, and a tape of your 42nd birthday party. --- 422-09 --------------------------------------------------------------- Selected-By: CLHP19@vaxb.strathclyde.ac.uk The Usenet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was: > Oh Oracle, who is both piecewise continuous and smooth, who is > integrable over an infinite range, who extends into the most > complex of planes and still retains his basic convolution, who > could call Newton a twit to his face, and still stand, who knows > Fourier was faking it, and Gauss liked to dress in womens clothing, > who realizes all the implications of special and general relativity and > maintains a firm grasp of quantum mechanics while they work on his car, > and who would never vote for a twit like Buchanan, answer me this one > question which has vexed me for so long. > > Why did I want to study Electrical Engineering? > > Oh, great Oracle, who is everything in the above grovel and more, > if I should change majors, what should I take? And in response, thus spake the Oracle: } I'm happy to see that you mortals are finally beginning to get the } rhythm of the grovel. Though you left out that I've solved Fermat's } Last Theorem. } } Now, to your question. I think it is obvious that there are only 3 } reasons why people choose to study electrical engineering: parental } pressure, inability to relate to anything that doesn't have a } transistor, and MONEY. The last often makes up for the first two. } Since I *am* the all-knowing Oracle, I will add that your particular } urges toward EE are rooted deep in your childhood, when you saw } your mother's RISC-based architecture. } } If you should change majors, I'd recommend something less stressful, } like Chemistry. If you're the overcompensation type, many Universities } offer programs in Natural Resource Studies, Peace Studies, Theology } and others. Research shows that students who graduate in these majors } tend to: live below the poverty line, have friends named "Popper", } freak out at school reunions, and manage to feel happy and noble about } all this. } } You owe the Oracle a theology thesis on the Usenet Oracle. --- 422-10 --------------------------------------------------------------- Selected-By: "Stephen C. Miller" The Usenet Oracle has pondered your question deeply. Your question was: > Should the government suspend its new policy of turning drug trafficers > into pigs? And in response, thus spake the Oracle: } ** The oracle stays perfectly motionless. } ** The oracle swiftly moves in bounding steps. } ** The oracle is now perfectly motionless, poised to leap } on Lisa, who's 'it'. } ** The oracle tagged Lisa in the millisecond } between. } } Lisa pouts, and trying to distract the oracle, says, "here's the mail } deamon again; you have a question from one of your supplicants." } } "All right.", the oracle says, grumbling ever so slightly. The oracle } takes the question from the deamon, reads it, and Lisa disappears in } the microsecond it takes to read the question. } } The oracle thinks for a nanosecond, and quips to the deamon, "Yes, drug } trafficers should be made into traffic lights.". The oracle then } transforms the deamon into a little piggey, who runs off going 'wee } wee' all the way home.